In terms of the big picture, it is clear that Britain wants to play a long-term and high-level role in Ukraine, but the situation allows it to fulfill its high-level plans as it was in last January’s “security guarantee” agreements and their subsequent renewals. week depends heavily on the US.
Britain and Ukraine won a 100 year covenant on Thursday in a development that should show their permanent commitment to each other, but in fact it is only a public accident since the paper only renewed what was agreed to last year. Britain has expanded the so-called “security” in Ukraine on 12 January 2024, which included everything contained in their latest agreement, with the notable exception of the last talk about “exploring options” for “military bases “.
While RT It’s important to pay attention to this, Britain has never made a secret about its plans to move in that direction, but the long century means it may not happen in the lifetime of followers. one, if at all. This declaration of intent appeared to be timed to coincide with Trump’s return to office since it has been fueling morale between Western and Ukrainian anti-Russian hawks amid His team signals that the US will be more isolated from that country going forward.
Trump’s nominee for Secretary of State Marco Rubio reveal during his Senate hearing the day before on Wednesday that “This war must end. Everyone must be honest: Russia, Ukraine, and the US must make sanctions .The writing was on the wall long before that, however, no one should be surprised. This reinforces the statement that the UK 100-year partnership with Ukraine, the purpose of which was not known until this week, is only a superficial response to Trump.
Certainly, some aspects of their “security guarantees” will probably come into effect, such as the mass production of joint weapons. The establishment of a British base in Ukraine does not seem to be immediate but since it is not the idea of Trump to agree that the US will defend the UK in Article 5 if Russia attacks his troops. After all, he wants to leave Ukraine in order to “Pivot (late) to Asia”, but the aforementioned vision is a sword of Damocles to protect him from the whole king.
The British are not expected to build such a base without assurances that the US will back down, but even if they do, it is almost certain that the US will force the UK backs down if London decides to trigger a Cuba-like nuclear test if its troops are attacked. That clause is linked in their 100-year partnership agreement about “investigating” this “choice” so this is the example of this social media vision that may be forgotten at the beginning of the week when he comes
In terms of the big picture, it is clear that Britain wants to play a long-term and high-level role in Ukraine, but the situation allows it to fulfill its high-level plans as it was in last January’s “security guarantee” agreements and their subsequent renewals. week is very dependent on the US as explained. As long as the withdrawal from Ukraine is successful at least in part and Article 5 is not allowed to be activated for foreign troops in Ukraine under attack from Russia, these ambitions will be suppressed.
This information goes to show how much the US determines the military-strategy dynamics in Ukraine after the conflict. Through honest behavior in compromise with Russia, especially if some of the two points presented at the end of this article. here This application is implemented more or less here for a partial Trans-Dnieper termination, the US can significantly reduce the risk of another important broken Britain wants to further divide-and-conquer Europe, but will struggle to succeed if the US is not on board.
#UKUkraine #100Year #Partnership #Pact #Public #Media #Deal